摘要：本文是一篇关于史志目录考证的论文，研究对象为《宋志》。主要科研工作分为三步：首先，将《宋志》与其他其他相关目录著作如《隋志》，《旧唐志》《新唐志》《崇文总目》《通志略》《遂初堂书目》《读书志》《解题》《玉海》《通考》等进行全面比较，考校出疑误或异文并按类分章；其次，参考历代史籍进行论证；最后进行归纳总结。

本文的创新之处体现在如下几方面：第一，对《宋志》的编修过程及价值有了更深入的探讨。如：提出《宋志》的编修不是像前人所说以《中兴志》为底本，再以北宋《国史志》为补充，而应是将反映北宋藏书的三部《国史志》直接拼合在一起，再与《中兴志》进行比较，删除重复。第二，以《宋志》为中心，将元代（含）以前绝大部分目录学著作进行了比较，考校出异文百余条，其中多数条目为本文首次提出，另有一些条目虽然前人已有提及，但在论证方面，本文或补充了新材料，论证更深入，或者有新角度。对于与该条目有关之后世文献及后人有疑问的观点，亦加以辩证。第三，对《宋志》的著述体例及刊刻的版式及影响进行了探索，对《宋志》中许多失作者的条目进行了考证。第四，对《宋志》的重出条目有了更深入的挖掘，发现许多不易察觉的重出条目。

关键词： 《宋史·艺文志》  考异  目录学

Abstract: This paper is a collation study on the historical catalog books (shizhi mulu). The research object is the History of Song Dynasty, Bibliography (Songshi yiwenzhi) (hereinafter referred to as "Songzhi"). The research consists three stages: firstly, a comprehensive comparison of Songzhi and other related catalog works such as Suishu jingjizhi, Jiutangshu jingjizhi, Xintangshu yiwenzhi, Chongwen zongmu, Tongzhi yiwenlue, Suichutang shumu, Junzhai dushuzhi, Zhizhai shulu jieti, Yuhai, Wenxian tongkao to identify and categorize errors and textual differences; secondly, analyze and demonstrate the results based on historical records; finally, induction and summarization.

This study is groundbreaking in the following perspectives. Firstly, the composing process and value of Songzhi have been further explored. For example, the research finds out that the compilation of Songzhi is firstly a simple combination of three volumes of Guoshi zhi, a book that details book collection in Beisong Dynasty, and then the redundant parts identified during comparison to Zhongxing zhi were deleted. This finding corrects the previous belief that Songzhi is fundamentally based on Zhongxing guoshi yiwenzhi, and supplemented by Guoshi zhi. Secondly, based on Songzhi, the research did a textual analysis of most catalog literature prior to and including Yuan Dynasty, discovered hundreds of textual differences, most of which overlooked by scholars previously; even for those mentioned before, the research proposes new perspective, enhances the discussion and includes new supporting evidence. The research also sheds light on later scholarly literature and scholarly dispute regarding Songzhi. Thirdly, the combined effects of Songzhi's catalog arrangement form and its typography in various printing versions are explored, and the research examined multiple entries with missing authors. Forth, a more in-depth exploration of the entry repetition in Songzhi leads to many undiscovered repeated entries.

Key Words: Songzhi yiwenzhi   textual criticism    bibliography

导师：安平秋教授