中文 |English
博士论文摘要
2010届“儒家思想与儒家经典”方向博士生 胡宇芳《家铉翁〈春秋集传详说〉研究》摘要

摘要:经学是中国古代学术的核心内容,《春秋》是中国古代经典之一,五经之中,宋人研究《春秋》的著作最多,《春秋》学是宋代经学的重要组成部分。

本文以宋元之际家铉翁及其《春秋集传详说》为研究对象,从文献学的角度入手,依次就家铉翁的生平及其著述,家铉翁对《春秋》经性质、宗旨的认识,《春秋集传详说》的撰述方式、解经方法,家铉翁的《春秋》学思想,对家铉翁《春秋集传详说》的评价等问题,进行全面的分析和考察。

第一章讨论家铉翁的生平、著述及其对《春秋》经性质、宗旨的认识。家铉翁生活在由宋入元时期,亲历南宋灭亡,并被元朝羁縻于河间十七年,然而始终不屈,以气节著称,为时人及后世所褒扬。《春秋集传详说》及《纲领》为其现存的《春秋》学著作,其《春秋》学既有家学渊源,又有对先贤时修的继承。家铉翁认为《春秋》是经非史,寓有孔子明王道的政治理想;始隐终麟正乱王法之贼是《春秋》的著述宗旨;行夏之时既是孔子行王法之一事,亦是其修《春秋》所采用的记时方法;《春秋》因事以垂法于后,寓王道于行事之中。

第二章探讨家铉翁《春秋集传详说》的撰述方式。兼采三传及其注疏,取舍前贤时修之说,既是家铉翁研治《春秋》的方法,也是《春秋集传详说》的撰述方式。家铉翁认为三传皆为解经之作,经传并行,三传各有所长。兼采三传及其注疏,取三传之是者,而于三传之非者,加以驳正。对前贤时修之说亦取其是而驳其非。于三传及众说犹不能解疑者,则以己意述之。

第三章探讨家铉翁《春秋集传详说》的解经方法。书法、义例是学者们研治《春秋》的主要方法,书法与义例既有联系又有区别。以经文为据依,家铉翁既对三传及前贤义例批评驳正,同时自己也归纳《春秋》义例以解经,主张以例解经当随事而观,不可拘执于义例。家铉翁认为以书法解经是求《春秋》之义的常法,对《春秋》记事的原则进行细致分析,归纳以书法求《春秋》之义的方式。此外,家铉翁也以史学方法解经,其中最为突出的是采用互见并释之法。

第四章探讨家铉翁的《春秋》学思想。即藉由《春秋集传详说》,讨论他对《春秋》大义如王霸、夷夏、自强、复仇的观点。家铉翁对自强和复仇的阐述具有鲜明的时代特色,其间亦有他对于时政的看法。

结语部分对家铉翁《春秋集传详说》进行评价,讨论其在宋代及其后《春秋》学上的地位。

关键词: 宋代  家铉翁  《春秋》  《春秋集传详说》


A Study on Jiaxuanweng Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo

Abstract: Study of Confucian classics was the coral content of the ancient systematic learning, Chunqiu was one of Chinese ancient classics, during the five classics, works of study on the Chunqiu was the most in Song Dynasty, learning of Chunqiu was important component of Research of Confucian classics in Song Dynasty.

This article takes Jiaxuanweng who lived between Song and Yuan Dynasty and his Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo as the object of study, in the point of philology, successively analyzing and observing these questions, for example, Jiaxianweng's life and works, his knowledge about character and purpose of Chunqiu, writing pattern and interpreting way about Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo, Jiaxianweng's thought about the learning of Chunqiu, evaluating about Jiaxianweng's Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo.

The Charter I discusses Jiaxuanweng's life, works and his knowledge about character and purpose of Chunqiu. Jiaxuanweng lived from Song into Yuan Dynasty, suffering the destruction of South Song Dynasty and under Yuan Dynasty control in Hejian seventeen years, however, he didn't surrender all the time, he is famous for his integrity, compliment by his contemporaries and the later ages. Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo and guiding principle are his works about the learning of Chunqiu which existing, his learning of Chunqiu not only has foundation of profound learning inherited by the family, but also takes up the ideology of scholars of the past and his contemporaries. Jiaxuanweng considers that Chunqiu is classic and not history, contenting kongzi's political ideals which illuminating wangdao; at the beginning of Yingong and in the end of capturing unicorn, by which punish the traitors who confuse the imperial laws; using the lunar calendar is one of things which kongzi illuminates the imperial laws, also the way of time which kongzi writes Chunqiu; Chunqiu hands down the laws to the later by things, contents wangdao in the things.

The Charter II discusses Jiaxuanweng's writing pattern about Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo. Taking up sanzhuan and their notes and commentaries, accepting the ideology of scholars of the past and his contemporaries, what is not only the way of Jiaxuanweng studying Chunqiu, but also the writing pattern of Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo. Jiaxuanweng considers that sanzhuan also the works which interpret the Chunqiu, classic and commentaries on classics go side by side, sanzhuan that each one has its good points. He Takes up sanzhuan and their notes and commentaries, adopts the right and correcting the wrong of sanzhuan. As the ideology of scholars of the past and his contemporaries, he adopts the right and corrects the wrong. When sanzhuan and the other's interpret can't disambiguation, he explains by his own.

The Charter III discusses the interpreting way about Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo. Writing pattern and evidences are the principal methods by which scholars study Chunqiu, there are relation and difference between writing pattern and evidences. According to Chunqiu, Jiaxuanweng criticizes and corrects the evidences of sanzhuan and scholars of the past, at the same time, he concludes the evidences of Chunqiu himself, he allegates that interpreting by evidences should according to the things, can't starchy with the evidences. Jiaxuanweng considers that is common ways by writing pattern to searching the meaning of Chunqiu, he analyzes the principle of Chunqiu's records thoroughly, concluding the ways by writing pattern to searching the meaning of Chunqiu. In addition, Jiaxuanweng adopts the history way to interpret Chunqiu, the most prominent way is disclosure each other.

The Charter IV discusses Jiaxianweng's thought about the learning of Chunqiu. By Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo, discussing his views about cardinal principles of righteousness about Chunqiu, for example wang and ba, yi and xia, vengeance, self improvement. Jiaxianweng's interpret about vengeance and self improvement has distinct character of his epoch, there are his views about current politics in the interpretation, too.

The epilogue evaluates on Jiaxuanweng's Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo, discusses its status of the learning of Chunqiu in the Song Dynasty and the later.

Key Words: Song Dynasty   Jiaxuanweng   Chunqiu   Chunqiu Jizhuan Xiangshuo


导师:安平秋教授

上一篇:2010届“儒家思想与儒家经典”方向博士生 刘蔷《〈天禄琳琅书目〉研究》摘要

下一篇:2009届“儒家思想与儒家经典”方向博士生 王丰先《康熙朝御纂诸经编纂研究》摘要

关闭