中文 |English
博士论文摘要
2020届“儒家思想与儒家经典”方向博士生 吴瑶《关、洛“知”论研究 》摘要

摘要:“知”论的说法来自张岱年,用以泛指古代思想家关于“知”的理论,意在与认识论、知识论等相区分。张横渠与二程分别是关学和洛学的核心人物,其对“知”有着超越前辈学者的关注和探讨,其“知”论主要涉及到对不同的“知”的自觉辨析,对“知”的产生机制和不能“致知”的原因的分析,以及致知工夫的论述。

在不同的“知”的划分上,张横渠形成了三个层次、两组概念的概念体系。三个层次即未表现为具体的“知”的天德良知、不涉及好坏的具体的见闻之知、涉及到好坏且具体的诚明所知和闻见小知。两组概念分别是天德良知与见闻之知,诚明所知与闻见小知,其区分的标准分别是:是否是合内外的具体的知,和是否由本心合内外而知。程明道则以天德、固有之物、仁来阐释固有之知,并以德与学、守约与博学来区别具体的知。程伊川也有德性之知与见闻之知的说法,其相当于横渠的天德良知与闻见小知。并且,其以真知与常知、深知与浅知、实见与耳闻口道等来区别具体的知。在“知”的划分上,横渠与二程都承认具有固有之知。其二,其“知”都与德性有着密切的关系。其三,他们虽然都区别具体的知,但区分的标准略有差异。横渠的诚明所知和闻见小知是性质迥异的两种“知”,二程对自得和耳闻口道的区分却只是程度上的差异。其四,道德和知识的张力在三者的“知”论中初见端倪,横渠和伊川承认客观知识对于天德良知的推扩有助益作用,明道则仅承认道德知识对于固有之知的意义,而对客观知识采取漠视的态度。其五,他们区别不同性质的“知”的目的相同,都是为了确立真知,驳斥俗见和异端之见,具有判教和内部清扫的意义,从而挺立道学,是道学关心的成圣、尽性在“知”论上的体现。

在“知”的产生和不能“致知”的原因分析方面,三者都认为天德固有,不假闻见。而对于具体的“知”,横渠、伊川都认为是由耳目、物、心相作用而有,且伊川在入关讲学时尤其强调“发于中”,是对横渠合内外而知的发展。由于对天德良知的强调和对客观知识的漠视,明道缺乏对于具体的“知”的产生的论述。而之所以不能充分推扩固有之知,三者都将原因归诸到“心”,并且这样的理解得益于彼此的启发和影响。

在致知工夫方面,横渠针对闻见小知、耳目之蔽、存象之心分别提出对治的穷理、变化气质和大心举措,而伊川则主张涵养与格物共进。明道则始终坚持识仁、诚敬存之的体其是心的工夫。此差异根于三者对心性关系的不同理解,这一差异首先表现在养心和对治思虑纷扰的方案上,进而彰显为体其是心还是养心与穷理并进。明道认为体其本心或“敬”则无事,而横渠和伊川则认为,在不能绝物、灭思虑的情况下只能在已发上用功,因此还肯定了穷理、集义的意义。据此,明道对横渠的工夫有着直接的批评。此外,由心性关系的理解差异,还派生出三者对于格物穷理、识仁与学文的先后、训诂的态度等差异。

横渠与二程在互相影响、启发和借鉴下形成了结构大体相同、目标一致的“知”论体系,但由于心、性关系的理解差异又彰显出了诸多差异。在其相互的关系上,横渠与明道的直接交流和评述更多,伊川对横渠与明道的取益更大,横渠与伊川在“知”论体系的架构上更为相似。且横渠和伊川的“知”论较之于明道呈现出更加系统、丰富、细腻的特点。三者在“知”论上都提出了诸多具有创发性的思想,就此而言,三者是并列的地位,而非横渠师事二程,或者明道屈附于伊川。

关、洛“知”论不仅具有开辟性的意义,对于后世论“知”也产生了重要影响,对于今人所关心的知识、教育、科学、认知也有启发。一方面,作为仁智并举的“知”论,对于处理知识和道德的关系提供了重要资源;另一方面,作为一种对治私见的“知”论,对于处理人类与自然,安顿人和万物也提供了重要的思路。

关键词:张载   程颢   程颐   知   致


Abstract: The concept of the theory on "zhi" comes from Zhang Dainian, which generally refers to ancient thinkers' theories about "zhi", aiming to distinguish them from epistemology. Zhang Zai and the two Cheng brothers are the core figures of the school of Guan and the school of Luo respectively. They payed more attentions to "zhi" than their predecessors. Their theories on "zhi" mainly involve the discrimination and mechanism of "zhi", the reasons why "zhi" can't be extended, and how to extend "zhi".

In the aspect of discrimination of "zhi", Zhang Zai has formed a conceptual system of three levels and two groups of concepts, namely, the innate knowledge and the knowledge of what is heard or what is seen, and the knowledge gained through enlightenment and the small knowledge of what is heard or what is seen. The criteria of the division are: whether "zhi" is innate, and whether it is from the work of the moral heart. Cheng Hao interprets the innate knowledge by inherent things and ren, and distinguishes concrete knowledge by virtue and learning, concentrating on the essentials and erudition. Cheng Yi also discusses the concepts of the knowledge of virtue and the knowledge of what is heard or what is seen, which are equivalent to Zhang's the innate knowledge and the small knowledge of what is heard or what is seen. Moreover, he distinguishes concrete knowledge by concepts like deep knowledge and shallow knowledge, real knowledge and knowledge just from hearing or seeing. In the division of "zhi", Zhang and the two Cheng brothers all admit that there are innate knowledge. Secondly, the "zhi" that people should pursuit are closely related to virtue. Third, although they all distinguish concrete knowledge, there are some differences in the standards of differentiation. Zhang’s the knowledge gained through enlightenment and the small knowledge of what is heard or what is seen are different in nature. In the view of the two Cheng brother, the deep and shallow knowledge shows the difference in cognitive degree, not the difference of the nature. Fourth, the tension between morality and knowledge was beginning to appear in their theories of "zhi". Zhang and Cheng Yi think that objective knowledge is helpful for extension of "zhi" while Cheng Hao think only moral knowledge is helpful. Fifthly, they have the same purpose to distinguish different kinds of "zhi". They hope to extend true knowledge otherwise the shallow and heretical views, which has the significance of determining what are the core thoughts of Confucianism and is the manifestation of becoming the sage and fully developing one's nature.

In the generation mechanism of "zhi", they all think that the innate knowledge is inherent. For concrete knowledge, Zhang and Cheng Yi both think that they are formed by the interaction of ears and eyes, objects and mind. Cheng Yi especially emphasizes "zhi" is action from within when he went to Zhang’s hometown to give speeches after Zhang passed away, which is the development of Zhang’s thoughts. Due to the emphasis on the innate knowledge and the ignorance of objective knowledge, Cheng Hao lacks the discussion about how concrete knowledge are generated. In the reasons why "zhi" can't be extended, they all attribute the reason on the mind, and such understandings benefit from each other's inspirations and influences.

In terms of extending "zhi", Zhang proposed the measures like investigating principle, changing temperament and enlarging one's mind to solve problems like the small knowledge of what is heard or what is seen, the limitations of the eyes and ears, human heat respectively, while Cheng Yi advocated that self-cultivation requires seriousness and the pursuit of learning depends on the extension of knowledge. Compared with Zhang and Cheng Yi, Cheng Hao always insists on completely preserving mind, specifically, being sincere, understanding the nature of ren, preserving ren with sincerity and seriousness and so on. This difference is rooted in their different understanding of the relationship between mind and "xing". This difference is first manifested in the solution of suffering from the influence of external things. Furthermore, the difference is also manifested in whether sincere should be combined with investigating principle. Cheng Hao thinks that there is nothing that should be done if always being sincere, while Zhang and Cheng Yi affirm the significance of investigating principle. Therefore, Cheng Hao has a lot of criticism on Zhang’s theories about extending "zhi". In addition, there are other differences, like their attitudes towards investigating principle, understanding ren, and the views about exegesis.

Zhang and the two Cheng brothers have deep communications on the theories of "zhi". Under the mutual influences and inspirations, they have developed and formed systems of "zhi" which is basically the same and with the same goal. However, due to the different understandings about the relationship between mind and "xing", there are also many differences in their theories. Generally speaking, Zhang and Cheng Hao had more direct communications and mutual inspirations. Cheng Yi absorbed more from Zhang and his brother. However, in terms of the theoretical frameworks, Zhang and Cheng Yi are more similar. The theory of "zhi" of Zhang and Cheng Yi is more systematic and delicate. As for the historical status, from the perspective of "zhi", they all put forward many creative ideas, therefore, they are all great thinkers, rather than the two Cheng brother is Zhang’s teacher or Cheng Hao is inferior to Cheng Yi.

The theories om "zhi" of Guan school and Luo school not only has a pioneering concern and discussion for "zhi", has an important influence on later generations' theories of "zhi", but also has inspirations for the understanding of knowledge, education, science and cognition at present. On the one hand, the theory of "zhi" provides important inspirations for dealing with the relationship between knowledge and morality; on the other hand, it also provides important ideas for dealing with human and nature, settling the relationships between humans and other beings.

Key Words: Zhang Zai   Cheng Hao   Cheng Yi   "zhi"   extending "zhi"


导师:魏常海教授

上一篇:2020届“儒家思想与儒家经典”方向博士生 徐志超《〈宋史•艺文志〉考异》摘要

下一篇:2020届“儒家思想与儒家经典”方向博士生 汪博《治道之经纬 ——荀子礼法思想研究》摘要

关闭